Human Impact & Conservation — Practice · Grade 10 Science

Chapter: Ecosystems & Conservation Decisions

What this practice covers

By the end of Human Impact & Conservation you should be able to:

11 questions, multiple choice, numeric and written answer, each with a worked explanation.

Vocabulary used: biodiversity, greenhouse gas, habitat fragmentation, invasive species, sustainability, conservation.

Problem 1

Worldwide, what is the single leading cause of species extinction and biodiversity loss?
  1. Collecting animals for zoos
  2. Too many decomposers
  3. Volcanic eruptions
  4. Habitat loss and fragmentation
Answer and explanation

Habitat loss and fragmentation

Destroying and fragmenting habitat removes the places species need to live and is the biggest driver of biodiversity loss.

Problem 2

Greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide warm the planet because they
  1. absorb and re-radiate heat that would otherwise escape to space
  2. block sunlight from ever reaching Earth's surface
  3. cool the atmosphere by releasing oxygen
  4. destroy the ozone layer directly
Answer and explanation

absorb and re-radiate heat that would otherwise escape to space

Greenhouse gases let sunlight in but trap outgoing heat (infrared), re-radiating some of it back toward the surface and warming it.

Problem 3

A toxin is present at 0.02 ppm in algae and biomagnifies about 10 times at each trophic level. What is its concentration, in ppm, in a fish two trophic levels above the algae?
Answer and explanation

2 ppm

0.02 × 10 × 10 = 2 ppm.

Problem 4

Why do invasive species often grow out of control in a new ecosystem?
  1. Native species immediately go extinct on their own
  2. They arrive without the predators, diseases, and competitors that limited them back home
  3. They can survive without any energy source
  4. New ecosystems always have unlimited resources
Answer and explanation

They arrive without the predators, diseases, and competitors that limited them back home

Without their usual limiting factors, invasive populations can grow explosively and outcompete native species.

Problem 5

Describe two different actions — one personal and one societal — that promote sustainability, and explain how each reduces human impact on ecosystems.
Answer and explanation

A personal action is reducing, reusing, and recycling, which cuts the demand for raw materials and energy and lessens pollution and habitat destruction from extracting new resources. A societal action is shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy like solar and wind, which lowers greenhouse gas emissions and slows climate change. Both meet human needs while using resources at a rate ecosystems can sustain, protecting biodiversity for the future. (Other valid answers include protecting habitat, sustainable farming or fishing, and using less water or energy.)

Problem 6

A wildlife corridor increases sightings but population size is unknown. What can be concluded? Explain the reasoning in your own words.
Answer and explanation

Use is plausible; population recovery is not established by sightings alone.

Sightings suggest corridor use, but detectability and sampling effort matter.

Population growth needs independent abundance or reproduction evidence.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated conditions.
  • Show the evidence or calculation.
  • Explain the conclusion and any stated limitation.

Problem 7

Why match runoff controls to water-quality threats instead of assuming a corridor solves them? Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

The success measure must match the conservation goal.

Answer and explanation

Different interventions address different mechanisms; connectivity does not necessarily reduce pollutant inputs.

Problem 8

What should a monitoring plan specify?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

Baseline, indicators, comparable methods, timing, uncertainty and criteria for revising the intervention.

Problem 9

A larger count can reflect improved detection rather than recoveryA larger count can reflect improved detection rather than recoveryObserved individuals010203040500123Monitoring intervalChanged survey effortComparable reference
Original hypothetical monitoring-confound record, not actual conservation outcome data.
Interpret the supplied visual. Why is attributing the whole jump to protection uncertain when survey effort increased?
Answer and explanation

Detection changed with the intervention period and can increase counts; comparable sampling or modeled correction is needed.

Detection probability is the chance of observing a present organism under a sampling method. A count can rise when effort, access, season or tools change even without equal population growth. An intervention evaluation needs baseline and follow-up measurements with suitable comparison sites and comparable methods. Before–after evidence establishes temporal order but does not alone isolate cause. Several indicators can reveal tradeoffs that one abundance measure hides, including condition, reproduction, habitat quality and unintended effects.

Detection changed with the intervention period and can increase counts; comparable sampling or modeled correction is needed.

Response criteria

  • Read the structures, axes, directions and units correctly.
  • Connect the evidence with the biological mechanism.
  • Respect stated model assumptions and distinguish an observation from a further inference.

Problem 10

After restoration, observed animals rise from 40 to 60, but survey effort doubles. Explain why a 50% recovery claim is not established and suggest a better evaluation.
Answer and explanation

The raw count rises 50%, but changed detection can contribute. Use comparable effort/methods, suitable reference sites and repeated population/condition indicators; estimate detection where appropriate before attributing recovery.

The raw count rises 50%, but changed detection can contribute. Use comparable effort/methods, suitable reference sites and repeated population/condition indicators; estimate detection where appropriate before attributing recovery.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the biological mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Problem 11

OpenSciEd historical American tree sparrow abundance-indicator graph with year-to-year changes and an overall decline, credited to Zeller et al. (2019) and Mass.gov; vertical units are not specified as a census count.
Historical abundance indicator from the OpenSciEd case; the vertical scale is not labeled as a population census or percentage. Historical American tree sparrow abundance indicator · OpenSciEd · 7.5 Ecosystem Dynamics, Lesson 10 graph; data source retained in image, source, CC BY 4.0. Figure excerpt rendered from the PDF and resized for the web.
Compare the source corn/soybean acreage graph in the lesson with this tree-sparrow indicator. Name their different variables, time coverage and vertical-unit limits. Explain why their broad patterns alone do not prove that planted acreage caused the entire bird trend, and propose a stronger comparison.
Answer and explanation

Acreage measures US land planted in millions of acres over 1997–2017; the bird indicator covers a longer selected historical period through 2019 and has no stated census/percentage unit. Their regions, methods and other conditions require clarification. Broad opposing patterns can motivate a habitat hypothesis, but matched local habitat/bird monitoring with comparable effort, relevant controls and alternative pressures would test causality more directly.

Keep land area separate from an abundance indicator.

Check years, area and method; do not convert the bird axis into percent without definition.

Propose comparable local surveys and control for detection/other pressures.

Response criteria

  • Identify the different variables and periods.
  • Do not invent a bird census or percentage unit.
  • Explain causal limits and propose appropriate matched evidence.

Browse all courses