The Cold War’s End & a Changing International Order — Practice · Grade 8 Social Studies
Chapter: Cold War: Systems, Conflicts & TransitionWhat this practice covers
By the end of The Cold War’s End & a Changing International Order you should be able to:
- I can explain pressures and reforms.
- I can explain a historical claim using relevant evidence and acknowledge its limits.
6 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: context, corroboration, interpretation, glasnost, dissolution.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
It omits internal economic and political conditions, popular movements, other governments, and institutional decisions. Explain interactions and relative contributions.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Opening a border and combining state institutions are different actions with different dates and consequences.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
It changes state membership, sovereignty, territorial relationships, and institutions. Leadership change within an existing state is a different process.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. It ended a particular structure of rivalry, while regional conflicts, security concerns, and other international disputes continued.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The sequence supports a setting for interaction, not proof that reform alone caused every later event. Popular movements and institutional decisions mattered, and further evidence is needed to weigh their contribution.
Place events in sequence.
Explain possible mechanisms involving political space and institutional authority.
Request economic, organizational, and decision records to weigh contributions.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Use relevant evidence and explain how it supports the claim.
- Represent perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify a limitation, counterevidence, or information still needed.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
The wall opened in 1989; Germany reunified in 1990; the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. These are distinct events.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Use relevant evidence and explain how it supports the claim.
- Represent perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify a limitation, counterevidence, or information still needed.