Primary vs Secondary Sources — Practice · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Geography & the Tools of HistoryWhat this practice covers
By the end of Primary vs Secondary Sources you should be able to:
- I can explain primary vs secondary sources with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: primary source, secondary source, point of view (bias), corroborate.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
Yes. It directly records that recollection, while elapsed time limits what it establishes about the earlier event.
Yes. It directly records that recollection, while elapsed time limits what it establishes about the earlier event.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
A secure verbal statement of its owner’s name, laws or beliefs without a justified decipherment.
A secure verbal statement of its owner’s name, laws or beliefs without a justified decipherment.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
That the ruler or administration promoted that image, rather than that every claimed achievement occurred as described.
That the ruler or administration promoted that image, rather than that every claimed achievement occurred as described.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. Trace their shared source and seek genuinely additional evidence.
No. Trace their shared source and seek genuinely additional evidence.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed.
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
A secure verbal statement of its owner’s name, laws or beliefs without a justified decipherment. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
A secure verbal statement of its owner’s name, laws or beliefs without a justified decipherment. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Trace their shared source and seek genuinely additional evidence.
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Trace their shared source and seek genuinely additional evidence.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
The object supports claims about carving and surviving marks. The museum description is a modern scholarly account. The blog’s precise political conclusion is unsupported by an unread inscription; settlement and other evidence would be needed. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.