The Rise of Villages & Specialization of Labor — Practice · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Early Humans & the Neolithic RevolutionWhat this practice covers
By the end of The Rise of Villages & Specialization of Labor you should be able to:
- I can explain the rise of villages & specialization of labor with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: permanent settlement, specialization of labor, artisan, barter, social class.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
No. Ownership and distribution require additional evidence.
No. Ownership and distribution require additional evidence.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
No. Work roles can overlap by season and household.
No. Work roles can overlap by season and household.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
No. Compare governance evidence rather than treating an economic condition as a fixed political cause.
No. Compare governance evidence rather than treating an economic condition as a fixed political cause.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. Burial practices and preservation complicate that inference.
No. Burial practices and preservation complicate that inference.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair.
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
No. Work roles can overlap by season and household. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
No. Work roles can overlap by season and household. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Burial practices and preservation complicate that inference.
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Burial practices and preservation complicate that inference.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Only 10 are allocated to exchange in this model;20 are reserved. The arithmetic does not establish who controlled storage, who worked or whether distribution was fair. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.