Classical India & China: Empires & the Silk Roads — Drills · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Classical Civilizations & Belief SystemsWhat these drills covers
By the end of Classical India & China: Empires & the Silk Roads you should be able to:
- I can explain classical india & china: empires & the silk roads with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
4 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: Maurya Empire, Ashoka, Gupta Empire, Han Dynasty, Silk Roads.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
No. They were distinct historical formations separated in time.
No. They were distinct historical formations separated in time.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
No. It documents a promoted policy or image and needs comparison with other evidence.
No. It documents a promoted policy or image and needs comparison with other evidence.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
No. Exchanges through multiple traders can connect distant regions.
No. Exchanges through multiple traders can connect distant regions.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Its benefits and surviving records do not describe every group’s experience.
Its benefits and surviving records do not describe every group’s experience.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.