Government, Authority, Legitimacy & the Rule of Law — Practice · Grade 12 Social Studies
Chapter: Foundations of Government & Public ReasoningWhat this practice covers
By the end of Government, Authority, Legitimacy & the Rule of Law you should be able to:
- I can distinguish a public institution from an officeholder.
- I can explain a civic or economic mechanism using evidence, assumptions, and a qualified conclusion.
8 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: government, state, authority, legitimacy, rule of law.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
An office has defined powers and procedures. Winning it changes the occupant, while authority may remain divided among a council, legislature, court, or other institution. A promise therefore needs a valid decision process and implementation before it establishes a policy outcome.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
People may comply because of sanctions, dependence, or lack of alternatives. Compliance shows behavior under particular conditions; legitimacy requires evidence about acceptance or justification. Check the governing rule and affected people’s reasoning rather than inferring consent from obedience.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
A purpose states what a policy is meant to achieve. Effects depend on financing, delivery, behavior, and circumstances. Compare evidence of benefits, costs, access, and alternatives before deciding whether the chosen mechanism served the purpose effectively.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Use records of notice, reasons, consistent treatment, opportunities to respond, and actual review. A written rule documents a framework, while administrative practice shows whether officials and applicants were constrained by it in particular decisions.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Collection establishes an exercise of practical power, while the supplied charter identifies a council procedure that has not occurred. The packet therefore supports questioning the mayor’s claimed authority. It does not establish all possible powers or legal remedies, and payment does not prove residents accepted the fee as justified. Review the complete rules, notices, decisions, and available review before drawing a broader conclusion.
Identify the charter’s approval rule.
Separate collection from valid enactment.
State what additional records could establish acceptance or a remedy.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. Disagreement about substance can coexist with established procedures and remedies. Evaluate the rule’s authority, consistent application, and opportunities for challenge separately from whether you approve of its policy aim. Unjust substance can still be criticized through evidence and stated principles.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Collection shows practical power and compliance under the supplied conditions. It does not establish residents’ acceptance or lawful authority. Compare the governing rule, approval procedure, and relevant reasons before making a legitimacy claim.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Compare application and decision records against the same criterion, require stated reasons, and identify an independent review route under the fictional rules. The discrepancy supports inquiry into consistent administration, not a conclusion about every past application.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.