Space Models: Scale, Evidence & Revision — Practice · Grade 6 Science

Chapter: Earth, Moon, Sun & Space Models

What this practice covers

By the end of Space Models: Scale, Evidence & Revision you should be able to:

8 questions, written answer and multiple choice, each with a worked explanation.

Vocabulary used: scale, revision, evidence, system boundary, uncertainty.

Problem 1

Why label size and distance scales separately?
Answer and explanation

A readability diagram may exaggerate body sizes while using another distance ratio. Without labels, numerical inferences can be false.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 2

Does 0.384 cm equal 38.4 mm?
Answer and explanation

No. Multiply centimeters by 10: it equals 3.84 mm. The model distance is much smaller than a large visibility sketch suggests.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 3

Why might an illustrator use an enlarged symbol?
Answer and explanation

To keep the object visible. The symbol can show its location, but its labeled size limit must accompany the diagram.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 4

What should be revised in the eclipse model?
Answer and explanation

Its flat-alignment assumption, with the appropriate tilted geometry; the entire concept of reflected sunlight need not be discarded.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 5

Develop a complete response: Calculate the stated model values and explain how the poster could still be labeled usefully. Include relevant evidence and one method or model limit.
Answer and explanation

The consistent values are 150 cm to the Sun, 0.384 cm or 3.84 mm to the Moon, and Earth diameter 0.0127 cm or 0.127 mm. The poster’s 2 cm Earth and 10 cm Moon separation do not follow that scale. Label its size and spacing as exaggerated for relationship viewing rather than present it as a numerical distance model.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 6

Apply the unit independently: A model correctly shows Moon phases but uses unrealistic distances. Must it be discarded for every purpose? Give a reason and a relevant qualification.
Answer and explanation

No. It may be useful for illumination geometry if its limits are stated. It should not be used for numerical distance or diameter comparisons without the appropriate scale.

Compare the scientific meaning and reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; human review is required.

Problem 7

Which statement correctly uses scale in Space Models: Scale, Evidence & Revision?
  1. One illustrative result establishes every real condition and needs no further evidence.
  2. A diagram that looks realistic must have correct numerical scale.
  3. A model with one limitation is useless for every purpose.
  4. scale: A stated ratio connecting represented and actual quantities with units.
Answer and explanation

scale: A stated ratio connecting represented and actual quantities with units.

A stated ratio connecting represented and actual quantities with units. The consistent values are 150 cm to the Sun, 0.384 cm or 3.84 mm to the Moon, and Earth diameter 0.0127 cm or 0.127 mm. The poster’s 2 cm Earth and 10 cm Moon separation do not follow that scale. Label its size and spacing as exaggerated for relationship viewing rather than present it as a numerical distance model.

Problem 8

Which statement correctly uses revision in Space Models: Scale, Evidence & Revision?
  1. revision: A reasoned change to a model or explanation in response to evidence or an identified limit.
  2. A diagram that looks realistic must have correct numerical scale.
  3. A model with one limitation is useless for every purpose.
  4. One illustrative result establishes every real condition and needs no further evidence.
Answer and explanation

revision: A reasoned change to a model or explanation in response to evidence or an identified limit.

A reasoned change to a model or explanation in response to evidence or an identified limit. The consistent values are 150 cm to the Sun, 0.384 cm or 3.84 mm to the Moon, and Earth diameter 0.0127 cm or 0.127 mm. The poster’s 2 cm Earth and 10 cm Moon separation do not follow that scale. Label its size and spacing as exaggerated for relationship viewing rather than present it as a numerical distance model.

Browse all courses