Entropy, Free Energy & Reaction Feasibility · Grade 11 Science

Chapter: Chemical Energy & Thermodynamics

Entropy, Free Energy & Reaction Feasibility

Learning goals

Readings for this unit

Before this unit

Energy signs, kelvin temperature, and algebra.

Use the detailed parent plan: two core 50–60-minute sessions per focused unit, with a third assigned for selected calculation/modeling topics. First study the core explanation and Parts 1–2 with their figures/checks; next study Parts 3–4, the whole-unit application, worked cases, varied practice and exit check. Attempt reasoning before opening guidance. Extend time when actual understanding requires it; investigations and chapter assessments have separate sessions.

Start with something to explain

Can a process absorb heat yet be thermodynamically favored?

Illustrative evidence case. A selected transformation has positive ΔH and a sufficiently positive ΔS at its stated temperature.

Entropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganEntropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganConstrained distributionMore accessible arrangementsEntropy concerns accessible microstates under specified constraints.
Original qualitative distribution comparison; dot arrangements are examples, not a counted thermodynamic microstate dataset.

Notice and wonder

Record two observations using the stated quantities or relationships. Keep observations separate from possible causes. Write one question that a new measurement could help answer.

Can a process absorb heat yet be thermodynamically favored?

Your first model

Compare the enthalpy term with TΔS using compatible units and a defined system.

Build the language from the idea

entropy
A measure related to accessible microscopic arrangements and energy dispersal.
Gibbs free energy
A thermodynamic potential useful for constant-temperature, constant-pressure processes.
spontaneous
Thermodynamically favored under stated conditions; not necessarily rapid.

Enthalpy alone does not determine whether a change is thermodynamically favored. Some endothermic processes occur readily because the total entropy of system and surroundings increases. Entropy counts accessible microscopic arrangements and energy dispersal; simply calling it disorder can hide what is being counted.

Entropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganEntropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganConstrained distributionMore accessible arrangementsEntropy concerns accessible microstates under specified constraints.
Original qualitative distribution comparison; dot arrangements are examples, not a counted thermodynamic microstate dataset.

For a system at constant temperature and pressure, Gibbs free-energy change is ΔG=ΔH−TΔS. Negative ΔG indicates a thermodynamic driving tendency in the specified conditions; positive ΔG favors the reverse; zero corresponds to equilibrium. Use temperature in kelvin and matching energy units.

Enthalpy and entropy jointly determine a free-energy changeEnthalpy and entropy jointly determine a free-energy changeΔG = ΔH − TΔSΔH = +20.0 kJ/mol; ΔS = +0.100 kJ/(mol·K)At 300 K: ΔG = 20.0 − 30.0 = −10.0 kJ/molUse kelvin and compatible energy units; state the conditions.
Original hypothetical thermodynamic values with a consistent molar basis, not a real material’s temperature-dependent property dataset.

A larger number of gas particles often increases entropy under comparable conditions, and dispersing a substance or warming it can increase accessible arrangements. These are useful tendencies, not universal replacements for data. Entropy changes in surroundings must also be considered to judge total entropy.

If ΔH<0 and ΔS>0, ΔG is negative at all positive temperatures in the simple constant-value model. If both are positive, sufficiently high temperature can favor the process. The crossover estimate T=ΔH/ΔS assumes those values are approximately constant across the interval.

Thermodynamically favorable does not mean fast. A large activation barrier can make a favored reaction proceed imperceptibly slowly. Catalysts change kinetic pathways but do not change the overall equilibrium constant or reaction ΔG for the same reactants and products.

Thermodynamic driving tendency does not set a reaction timescaleThermodynamic driving tendency does not set a reaction timescaleFree energy (relative units)02040608001234Reaction coordinate (schematic)Lower final free energy can coexist with a large forward barrier.
Original qualitative free-energy profile with arbitrary values, not a measured transition-state landscape or a practical reaction-time prediction.

For independent study, label enthalpy and entropy values as supplied at stated conditions. Convert J to kJ before subtracting. Describe the result as favorability under a model, not a prediction of completion time or a guarantee of laboratory outcome.

Build your understanding

Use the detailed parent plan: two core 50–60-minute sessions per focused unit, with a third assigned for selected calculation/modeling topics. First study the core explanation and Parts 1–2 with their figures/checks; next study Parts 3–4, the whole-unit application, worked cases, varied practice and exit check. Attempt reasoning before opening guidance. Extend time when actual understanding requires it; investigations and chapter assessments have separate sessions.

Part 1 · Explain entropy beyond a disorder slogan

Entropy S is a thermodynamic state quantity connected with the number and distribution of accessible microscopic arrangements. For suitable equal-probability microstate counting, S=kB ln W provides a useful bridge, while macroscopic changes can be evaluated through reversible heat transfer and temperature. “Disorder” is an imperfect analogy, not a measurement procedure. The same particle count can have different accessible arrangements when volume or other constraints change; assess the full system and surroundings rather than judging entropy from a messy-looking drawing.

Entropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganEntropy needs an energy-and-constraint account beyond a disorder sloganConstrained distributionMore accessible arrangementsEntropy concerns accessible microstates under specified constraints.
Original qualitative distribution comparison; dot arrangements are examples, not a counted thermodynamic microstate dataset.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why does a more spread-out dot picture not by itself determine a numerical entropy change?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

The relevant energy, constraints and accessible microstate model are not specified quantitatively. Appearance alone is insufficient.

Entropy relates to the number of accessible microscopic arrangements and energy dispersal in a thermodynamic description. Gas formation, mixing, and phase changes can influence it, but visual messiness is not a complete definition. Distinguish system entropy from total entropy including surroundings.

A system’s entropy can decrease while surrounding entropy increases sufficiently. Looking only at the system cannot establish the spontaneity of the full process.

Pause and explain

Can a spontaneous process have a negative system entropy change?

Check your reasoning after answering

Yes. A sufficiently positive surroundings contribution can make total entropy increase even if the system’s entropy decreases.

Part 2 · Use free energy under its conditions

At constant temperature and pressure under the appropriate constraints, Gibbs free energy helps assess the thermodynamic direction through ΔG=ΔH−TΔS. A process can be endothermic yet favored when the entropy term is sufficiently positive. Convert entropy units before multiplying by absolute T; joules and kilojoules cannot be subtracted without conversion. The result describes the specified state change under its conditions, not every possible mixture or a measured rate. State any approximation that ΔH and ΔS remain constant over a temperature range.

Enthalpy and entropy jointly determine a free-energy changeEnthalpy and entropy jointly determine a free-energy changeΔG = ΔH − TΔSΔH = +20.0 kJ/mol; ΔS = +0.100 kJ/(mol·K)At 300 K: ΔG = 20.0 − 30.0 = −10.0 kJ/molUse kelvin and compatible energy units; state the conditions.
Original hypothetical thermodynamic values with a consistent molar basis, not a real material’s temperature-dependent property dataset.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why can the selected positive-ΔH transformation have negative ΔG at 300 K?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

The positive entropy contribution TΔS=30.0 kJ/mol exceeds the 20.0 kJ/mol enthalpy cost.

At constant temperature and pressure, ΔG=ΔH−TΔS provides a feasibility criterion under suitable thermodynamic conditions. Use Kelvin and compatible energy units. Negative ΔG favors forward change for the stated actual conditions; zero corresponds to equilibrium; positive favors the reverse.

If ΔH is in kJ/mol and ΔS in J/mol·K, convert entropy to kJ/mol·K before multiplying by T.

Pause and explain

What common error changes a free-energy calculation by a factor of one thousand?

Check your reasoning after answering

Combining kJ enthalpy with J entropy without conversion. The two terms must use compatible energy units.

Part 3 · Distinguish actual and standard-state favorability

The standard reaction free energy ΔG° refers to a defined reference-state account. The actual driving tendency also depends on mixture composition through Q, the reaction quotient, using consistent dimensionless activities. At equilibrium Q=K and the reaction’s ΔG is zero. A negative ΔG° does not mean every possible starting mixture moves forward, because the RT ln Q contribution can change the actual sign. Concentration-only classroom expressions approximate activities and require an explicitly consistent convention.

Standard-state favorability and the actual mixture are differentStandard-state favorability and the actual mixture are differentΔG = ΔG° + RT ln QAt equilibrium: ΔG = 0 and Q = KΔG° = −RT ln KQ and K use compatible dimensionless activity conventions.
Original thermodynamic relationships; no logarithm of a dimensional raw concentration is intended.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why can a reaction with negative ΔG° fail to proceed net forward from a very product-rich starting mixture?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

A sufficiently large Q can make RT ln Q positive enough to change the actual ΔG; the mixture composition matters.

ΔG° describes standard-state conditions, while actual ΔG depends on reaction composition through ΔG=ΔG°+RT ln Q. A positive standard value does not prove no forward conversion can occur at any composition. Equilibrium links ΔG° to K rather than forcing all reactions to stop.

A reaction mixture far from standard ratios can have a different driving direction from the standard-state criterion.

Pause and explain

Why can actual composition change direction without changing ΔG°?

Check your reasoning after answering

The RT ln Q term reflects the mixture’s state. ΔG° is a reference property, while actual ΔG includes current activities.

Part 4 · Separate feasibility from rate

Thermodynamic feasibility and kinetics answer different questions. A lower product free-energy state can be favored while an activation barrier makes conversion slow on the observed timescale. A catalyst changes available pathways and rates without changing equilibrium for the same reaction and conditions. A free-energy curve is a model, not a stopwatch. Evidence for practical performance must include reaction time, pathway, transport and possible competing changes rather than only the endpoint sign.

Thermodynamic driving tendency does not set a reaction timescaleThermodynamic driving tendency does not set a reaction timescaleFree energy (relative units)02040608001234Reaction coordinate (schematic)Lower final free energy can coexist with a large forward barrier.
Original qualitative free-energy profile with arbitrary values, not a measured transition-state landscape or a practical reaction-time prediction.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Does a negative reaction free-energy change imply a reaction will finish quickly at room temperature?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

No. The activation pathway and other kinetic factors can make the change slow even when its direction is thermodynamically favored.

Thermodynamic favorability does not determine how quickly a process occurs. Activation barriers can make a favored reaction slow, and a catalyst can accelerate approach to equilibrium without changing ΔG° or K for the same temperature. State whether a conclusion concerns direction or timescale.

A calculated negative ΔG does not justify a claim of instant conversion or complete product recovery. Kinetics and equilibrium composition still matter.

Pause and explain

Does negative ΔG guarantee a fast process?

Check your reasoning after answering

No. It indicates thermodynamic direction under stated conditions, while rate depends on the kinetic pathway and barriers.

Apply the whole unit · Find a temperature-dependent sign change

Illustrative approximate values: ΔH=+40.0 kJ/mol and ΔS=+100 J/mol·K, treated as constant over the compared range. Compare 300 K and 500 K.

Your task

Calculate ΔG at both temperatures and the zero-crossing temperature, explain the competing terms, and state why the result is not a rate prediction or a universal standard-state/actual-state equivalence.

What your response should show

  • Choose the appropriate chemical model or relationship and state its conditions.
  • Show substitutions, units, particle or charge counts, and intermediate reasoning as relevant.
  • Use supplied evidence to justify the conclusion; distinguish observation from inference.
  • Identify a meaningful limitation, uncertainty, or next measurement.
Response guidance — after your attempt
  1. Convert ΔS to 0.100 kJ/mol·K.

  2. At 300 K: ΔG=40.0−300×0.100=+10.0 kJ/mol.

  3. At 500 K: ΔG=40.0−500×0.100=−10.0 kJ/mol.

  4. Zero crossing: T=ΔH/ΔS=400 K in the constant-value approximation.

The entropy term outweighs the positive enthalpy term above the modeled crossing. The calculation applies to the conditions associated with the supplied changes, with no guarantee they stay constant indefinitely. Standard-state values would describe ΔG° and actual composition adds another term. Neither sign establishes a reaction timescale.

Scientific references and source-model foundations

Parent / teacher teaching notes

Require Kelvin and an explicit J-to-kJ conversion. Ask direction, conditions, and rate as three separate questions. Ask the learner to explain each particle symbol, axis, unit and arrow before calculating. Distinguish hypothetical models and calculated curves from measured records. Public OpenSciEd excerpts here are selected foundation prompts, not complete high-school teacher editions or an endorsement. All required advanced explanations and practice are provided locally.

The key idea

Free energy connects enthalpy and entropy; kinetics determines how quickly change can occur.

Worked examples

Example 1

ΔH=+20kJ/mol, ΔS=+.100kJ/mol·K, T=300 K. Find ΔG.
  1. Use ΔG=ΔH−TΔS.
  2. 20−300(.100)=−10.
Answer: −10 kJ/mol; favored in this model

Example 2 · Worked application

Use ΔH=+10 kJ/mol and ΔS=+50 J/(mol·K) at 300 K to find ΔG.
  1. Convert entropy to 0.050 kJ/(mol·K).
  2. ΔG=ΔH−TΔS=10−300×0.050.
  3. Negative ΔG indicates thermodynamic favorability under the specified state, not rapid reaction.
Answer: ΔG=−5 kJ/mol.
Check the reasoning

Units and absolute temperature must match.

Example 3

ΔH=40kJ/mol and ΔS=.080kJ/mol·K. Find crossover.
  1. At ΔG=0, T=ΔH/ΔS.
  2. 40/.080.
Answer: 500 K, with the constant-value assumption.

Example 4 · Find and fix the mistake

Context: Use ΔH=+10 kJ/mol and ΔS=+50 J/(mol·K) at 300 K to find ΔG. A student claims: “A spontaneous reaction must happen instantly.” Evaluate the claim and write a corrected explanation.
  1. Test the claim against the stated conditions: Units and absolute temperature must match.
  2. Thermodynamic favorability says nothing by itself about kinetic speed; barriers can make favorable changes slow.
Answer: Thermodynamic favorability says nothing by itself about kinetic speed; barriers can make favorable changes slow.
Check the reasoning

Units and absolute temperature must match.

Example 5 · Reason from the visual model

Standard-state favorability and the actual mixture are differentStandard-state favorability and the actual mixture are differentΔG = ΔG° + RT ln QAt equilibrium: ΔG = 0 and Q = KΔG° = −RT ln KQ and K use compatible dimensionless activity conventions.
Original thermodynamic relationships; no logarithm of a dimensional raw concentration is intended.
Why can a reaction with negative ΔG° fail to proceed net forward from a very product-rich starting mixture?
  1. The standard reaction free energy ΔG° refers to a defined reference-state account. The actual driving tendency also depends on mixture composition through Q, the reaction quotient, using consistent dimensionless activities. At equilibrium Q=K and the reaction’s ΔG is zero. A negative ΔG° does not mean every possible starting mixture moves forward, because the RT ln Q contribution can change the actual sign. Concentration-only classroom expressions approximate activities and require an explicitly consistent convention.
  2. A sufficiently large Q can make RT ln Q positive enough to change the actual ΔG; the mixture composition matters.
Answer: A sufficiently large Q can make RT ln Q positive enough to change the actual ΔG; the mixture composition matters.
Check the reasoning

Original thermodynamic relationships; no logarithm of a dimensional raw concentration is intended.

Avoid these mistakes

Check your understanding

Distinguish favorable, fast, and complete.

Discuss the answer

Free energy addresses direction, activation barriers address rate, and equilibrium composition addresses extent.

Return to the phenomenon

Return to the initial case. Can a process absorb heat yet be thermodynamically favored? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Compare explanations after your attempt

The free-energy balance can be negative despite positive enthalpy. This still needs the actual mixture conditions and a separate kinetic account.

What should we investigate next?

Which comparison would test a remaining uncertainty? State what you would change, keep comparable and measure.

Investigate, calculate and revise

Keep a first model and an evidence-supported revision. Attempt each task before opening guidance; all required explanations and supplied-data routes are available locally.

Activity 1 · Return to the opening case

Assigned reading and preparation

Use the opening phenomenon, unit definitions and explained Parts 1–4.

Your task

Return to the initial case. Can a process absorb heat yet be thermodynamically favored? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated observations and appropriate units.
  • Connect a labeled model with the chemical mechanism.
  • State assumptions and an evidence limitation.
  • Explain a substantive revision or next test.
Hint

Keep species identity, material transfer and energy account distinct.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

The free-energy balance can be negative despite positive enthalpy. This still needs the actual mixture conditions and a separate kinetic account.

Activity 2 · Transfer to a changed case

Assigned reading and preparation

Cover the worked answer and use the explained models, relationships and notebook.

Your task

For a selected process use ΔH=+30.0 kJ/mol and ΔS=+0.150 kJ/(mol·K), treated constant. Find ΔG at 250 K, the modeled crossover temperature and one limit of the prediction.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the chemical mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Hint

Name known quantities and conditions, show intermediate steps and check conservation.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

At 250 K, ΔG=30.0−250(0.150)=−7.50 kJ/mol. The modeled crossover is 30.0/0.150=200 K. Actual ΔH/ΔS can vary with temperature and phases, and the calculation does not establish a rate.

Words to know

entropy
A measure related to accessible microscopic arrangements and energy dispersal.
Gibbs free energy
A thermodynamic potential useful for constant-temperature, constant-pressure processes.
spontaneous
Thermodynamically favored under stated conditions; not necessarily rapid.

In the real world

Use the chapter investigation to connect this unit to measured evidence and a practical decision.

Exit check

Distinguish favorable, fast, and complete.

Check your explanation after answering

Free energy addresses direction, activation barriers address rate, and equilibrium composition addresses extent.

Explain your reasoning without notes. If a key idea is missing, revisit the lesson and try again.

Browse all courses