Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos & Logos — Practice · Grade 9 English
Chapter: Argument & RhetoricWhat this practice covers
By the end of Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos & Logos you should be able to:
- I can identify ethos, pathos, and logos in a persuasive text.
- I can analyze how a writer combines rhetorical appeals to advance a purpose.
12 questions, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: ethos, pathos, logos, rhetoric.
Problem 1
- pathos
- logos
- ethos
- none of these
Answer and explanation
ethos
Citing professional credentials builds credibility — an appeal to ethos.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Each appeal does something different: ethos earns trust, pathos creates emotional investment, and logos provides logical proof. Combining them reaches readers who respond to facts and readers who respond to feeling, while establishing the writer's credibility throughout.
Problem 3
- logos
- ethos
- pathos
- none of these
Answer and explanation
pathos
A personal, emotional story paired with music is designed to evoke feeling — pathos.
Problem 4
- pathos
- logos
- ethos
- a fallacy
Answer and explanation
logos
Citing data and studies is an appeal to logic — logos.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Answers vary; look for a specific real or realistic example naming at least two appeals (ethos, pathos, or logos) and explaining how each was used to persuade.
Problem 6
- Logos, because it cites economic data
- Ethos and pathos together — establishing shared identity while evoking shared struggle
- Only logos, since it mentions rent
- None of the appeals — it is a fallacy
Answer and explanation
Ethos and pathos together — establishing shared identity while evoking shared struggle
Claiming shared background builds relatable credibility (ethos) while the mention of financial worry stirs emotional connection (pathos) — both at once.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
The image invites concern for access; the count supplies a reason to investigate demand. The voluntary sample limits generalization, so the writer should not treat the emotional image as proof of prevalence.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Ask what the numbers measure and how they were gathered. An appeal to logos can be present even when its reasoning is weak.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Ethos concerns credibility, logos concerns reasons and evidence, and pathos concerns emotions or values. Appeals often work together in the same passage. The method transfers, but the particular detail, scope, and context must be read again. The image invites concern for access; the count supplies a reason to investigate demand. The voluntary sample limits generalization, so the writer should not treat the emotional image as proof of prevalence.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
The supervisory role supports relevant ethos; the proposed attendance trial uses logos. The observed waiting illustrates a need but does not establish schoolwide demand. A complete response supplies context, a focused claim, a brief supporting detail, explanation, and a relevant qualification. Do not simply repeat this model.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 11
Answer and explanation
Check whether the response explains ethos concerns credibility, logos concerns reasons and evidence, and pathos concerns emotions or values. appeals often work together in the same passage. Ask for a relevant detail and the reason it supports the conclusion. Prioritize the mistaken assumption shown here: “Numbers always make an argument logical.”
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 12
Answer and explanation
The archive proposal values participation, the historian asks for traceable uncertainty, and the resident asks for consent. A labeled memory layer with dates and participant approval connects these concerns without turning memory into the original map. The response must supply its own precise detail and explain it; copying the model without fresh evidence is insufficient.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.