Integrate & Cite Evidence in Your Writing — Practice · Grade 7 English
Chapter: Research & Explanatory WritingWhat this practice covers
By the end of Integrate & Cite Evidence in Your Writing you should be able to:
- I can use the skills in Integrate & Cite Evidence in Your Writing with a relevant detail or sentence.
- I can explain the relationship, test a misleading claim, and revise independently.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: attribution, locator, evidence, qualification, revision.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
Identification of the source of words, information, or ideas. Integration joins a source detail with your own purpose and reasoning. Introduce the source accurately, use a short quotation or paraphrase, and explain its relevance. Dropping a quotation between unrelated sentences does not create a supported paragraph.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
This claim is misleading. Use supplied source labels and real locations. These fictional anthology records have no published page numbers, so cite Source C or Source D and the provided paragraph when appropriate. Do not invent a date, author, publisher, or page to make a citation look complete. Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. Use the available source letter, paragraph, or chapter locator. A fabricated reference prevents rather than enables verification.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. Use the available source letter, paragraph, or chapter locator. A fabricated reference prevents rather than enables verification.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Identification of the source of words, information, or ideas. The unit case offers this example to examine: Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
A paragraph, line, chapter, or other available label that helps a reader find evidence. The unit case offers this example to examine: Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Integration joins a source detail with your own purpose and reasoning. Introduce the source accurately, use a short quotation or paraphrase, and explain its relevance. Dropping a quotation between unrelated sentences does not create a supported paragraph. Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Synthesise sources by comparing their contributions to a question. The budget supplies an estimate; the letter identifies an access concern. One does not cancel the other. Explain why a plan may meet a listed budget while still requiring a scheduling revision. Source C estimates 300 tokens for the listed six-week trial costs, exactly matching the stated allowance. This supports feasibility only under those estimates; it does not measure every access need or unlisted cost. The revision identifies the source and explains why its budget cannot prove universal participation.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.