Argument Writing: A Defensible Claim — Practice · Grade 7 English

Chapter: Argument, Counterclaims & Revision

What this practice covers

By the end of Argument Writing: A Defensible Claim you should be able to:

10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.

Vocabulary used: qualification, reason, evidence, qualification, revision.

Problem 1

Explain qualification in the assigned reading, distinguishing it from a related idea.
Answer and explanation

Language that limits a claim to the conditions its evidence supports. An arguable claim gives a reader something to evaluate, not merely a topic. Limit its scope to the decision and evidence available. “Activities” is a topic; proposing a six-week trial with an access review is a claim that can be examined.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 2

Write a claim with two source-based reasons and one qualification.
Answer and explanation

A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 3

Evaluate this claim: “An argument requires absolute certainty.” Explain a correction in context.
Answer and explanation

This claim is misleading. Select evidence and explain its contribution. State the respondents and denominator when using 12 of 18. Describe the budget as an estimate with listed and excluded costs. A precise qualification prevents your argument from promising what the packet cannot establish. A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 4

Can a different schedule be a valid argument?
Answer and explanation

Yes, if the writer explains how it addresses the supplied preferences, access concern, and cost limits. Assess evidence and reasoning rather than matching the model’s preference.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 5

Develop an independent response: Write a claim with two source-based reasons and one qualification. Locate two useful details or choices, and explain one limit or alternative.
Answer and explanation

A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 6

Answer this transfer question: Can a different schedule be a valid argument? Test your answer against a second detail or a fresh sentence, explaining whether it needs qualification.
Answer and explanation

Yes, if the writer explains how it addresses the supplied preferences, access concern, and cost limits. Assess evidence and reasoning rather than matching the model’s preference.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 7

Explain qualification in your own words and give an example from the assigned reading or a fresh sentence.
Answer and explanation

Language that limits a claim to the conditions its evidence supports. The unit case offers this example to examine: A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 8

Explain reason in your own words and give an example from the assigned reading or a fresh sentence.
Answer and explanation

An explanation of why a claim should be accepted. The unit case offers this example to examine: A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 9

Correct the misleading statement “An argument requires absolute certainty.” and explain a detail that makes your correction necessary.
Answer and explanation

An arguable claim gives a reader something to evaluate, not merely a topic. Limit its scope to the decision and evidence available. “Activities” is a topic; proposing a six-week trial with an access review is a claim that can be examined. A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 10

Correct the misleading statement “A valid claim must match the model’s recommendation.” and explain a detail that makes your correction necessary.
Answer and explanation

Give reasons that connect the proposal with a purpose. The questionnaire supports considering a quieter drawing period; the letter supports improving access to the notice and schedule. Do not treat different kinds of evidence as if they answered the same question. A defensible claim is to test separate activity times and improve notices before adopting a permanent schedule. Source A identifies differing preferences among respondents, and Source D shows a scheduling and notice gap. Source C’s 300-token estimate supports only the listed trial costs. The proposal should collect additional feedback and revisit costs rather than guarantee equal access for everyone.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Browse all courses