Evaluating Complex Reasoning — Drills · Grade 12 English
Chapter: Argument & RhetoricWhat these drills covers
By the end of Evaluating Complex Reasoning you should be able to:
- I can distinguish deductive from inductive reasoning and hold each to the right standard — validity and true premises, or sufficiency and representativeness.
- I can surface hidden warrants and assumptions and identify subtle fallacies such as circular reasoning, false analogy, and the misuse of authority.
2 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: premise, warrant, sufficiency, inductive reasoning, circular reasoning.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
Separate a claim, reasons, evidence, and the assumption connecting them. A count can support a narrow observation without establishing a broad conclusion. Show an actual application before considering the method recalled.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
A preference does not test the evidence. Evaluate who was surveyed, how the count was collected, and whether the conclusion exceeds the finding.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.