The Invisible Trillion · The Legal Weapons
It Starts in Secret
The first move is the one the Grossers ran into: the non-disclosure agreement, signed not just by sellers but by the local officials themselves, before any real negotiation begins. It bars them from telling the public who the developer is, what’s being proposed, or sometimes that anything is being proposed at all.
This is not a fringe tactic. An NBC News investigation in late 2025 reviewed more than thirty data center proposals across fourteen states and found NDAs in the majority of them, with shell companies layered on top to keep the real developer’s name off the public filings. The officials signing them are usually part-time, often without legal staff, and genuinely hoping to land investment for a struggling local economy. They sign documents drafted by people who do this for a living. And the practical effect is that the layer of government closest to the affected residents — the one most accountable to them — becomes legally forbidden to tell them the basic facts.
The shell company finishes the job. The actual developer never appears. A generic entity is created, usually in Delaware, and it signs the contracts and files for the permits. In Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, reporting by Wisconsin Watch found that Meta built toward a billion-dollar, 520-acre data center using shell companies — one of them named, with a certain whimsy, “Balloonist LLC.” The NDA referred only to “the project.” For more than a year, officials worked on it while telling residents nothing, and by the time the public learned what was coming, the land was assembled and the deal was effectively done.
So picture a resident who suspects something is happening and tries to find out what. The public records say “Balloonist LLC.” Their elected officials are under legal seal. There is, by design, almost nothing to grab onto. You cannot organize against a project you cannot name, and that is rather the point — the American Economic Liberties Project, which has tracked the pattern, puts it simply: officials are supposed to answer first to their voters, not to a corporation they’re cutting deals with behind a confidentiality clause.
It doesn’t always work. Sometimes the secrecy backfires once it breaks. In Tucson, a proposed Amazon data center known throughout the process only as “Project Blue” — a $3.6 billion development — became public when a document reached a local reporter, and the resulting opposition was strong enough that the city council reversed itself and killed the project in 2025. But Tucson is the exception that shows what it takes: the public has to learn what’s happening early enough, and clearly enough, to push back before the dirt moves.
All 19 chapters of The Invisible Trillion · Library · All courses